Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Scoop InfoPages
This InfoPage in unregistered, if this is your news page register NZ Supreme Court for InfoPages here.
NZ Supreme Court - Latest News [Page 11]
Telecom Mobile v COmmerce Commission
Thursday, 30 March 2006, 11:13 am | NZ Supreme Court
This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. More >>
Sipa and Edwards v The Queen
Tuesday, 28 March 2006, 4:03 pm | NZ Supreme Court
Court: Tipping, McGrath and Anderson JJ Counsel: M Starling for Appellants F E Guy Kidd and M J Inwood for Crown Judgment: 28 March 2006 More >>
Jessop v The Queen
Monday, 27 March 2006, 4:55 pm | NZ Supreme Court
Court: Elias CJ, Blanchard and Tipping JJ Counsel: T Ellis for Appellant M D Downs for Crown Judgment: 27 March 2006 More >>
Cumming v The Queen
Monday, 27 March 2006, 4:20 pm | NZ Supreme Court
Court: Elias CJ, Blanchard and Anderson JJ Counsel: R M Lithgow for Applicant J C Pike for Respondent Judgment: 27 March 2006 More >>
Swetman and Westham Holdings v Globe Holdings
Monday, 27 March 2006, 4:05 pm | NZ Supreme Court
Swetman and Westham Holdings Limited v Globe Holdings Limited Sc 69/2005 [27 March 2006] More >>
Shirley v Wairarapa DHB
Tuesday, 21 March 2006, 12:21 am | NZ Supreme Court
Court: Tipping, McGrath and Anderson JJ Counsel: C J Hodson QC for Appellant M G Ring QC for Respondent More >>
Phillip Edward Crooks v the Queen
Monday, 20 March 2006, 11:12 am | NZ Supreme Court
PHILLIP EDWARD CROOKS v THE QUEEN JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. More >>
Judgment: Portage Licensing Trust v Avondale Hotel
Wednesday, 1 March 2006, 3:50 pm | NZ Supreme Court
A. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. B. The appellant is to pay the respondents costs in the sum of $2,500.00 plus disbursements, to be settled if necessary by the Registrar. More >>
Leave to Appeal: Malcolm Alan Francis v The Queen
Monday, 13 February 2006, 4:57 pm | NZ Supreme Court
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. More >>
Judgment: Udompun v Minister of Immigration
Thursday, 9 February 2006, 9:49 am | NZ Supreme Court
Udompun v Minister of Immigration And New Zealand Police Sc Sc 38/2005 [9 February 2006]: The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. More >>
Trans Otway Limited v Shephard And Dunphy
Friday, 2 December 2005, 4:29 pm | NZ Supreme Court
This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. More >>
Basil Steven Marshall Mist v the Queen
Friday, 2 December 2005, 4:28 pm | NZ Supreme Court
This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. More >>
John Patrick Round v The Queen
Thursday, 24 November 2005, 12:10 am | NZ Supreme Court
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. More >>
Paul Rodney Hansen v The Queen
Thursday, 24 November 2005, 12:09 am | NZ Supreme Court
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The application for leave to appeal is granted. More >>
Telecom Mobile v Commerce Commission
Wednesday, 23 November 2005, 12:53 am | NZ Supreme Court
The application for leave to appeal is granted. The approved ground, in terms of Rule 29, is whether the Court of Appeal was correct in its interpretation and application of s 12(2) of the Door to Door Sales Act 1967. More >>
Leave to Appeal: L v The Queen
Friday, 7 October 2005, 11:24 am | NZ Supreme Court
Court: Elias CJ and Tipping J Counsel: P J Davey for Appellant B J Horsley and E A Gambrill for Crown Judgment: 7 October 2005 More >>
Leave to appeal: Mafart And Prieur v TVNZ
Wednesday, 21 September 2005, 4:28 pm | NZ Supreme Court
MAFART AND PRIEUR V TELEVISION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED SC SC 50/05 [21 September 2005] More >>
Judgment: David Fruean v The Queen
Wednesday, 7 September 2005, 1:48 pm | NZ Supreme Court
[1] Mr Fruean’s appeal against conviction was dismissed by the Court of Appeal. The Court did not accept his contention that the trial Judge had failed to direct sufficiently on the use the jury could make of a mixed statement which he had made to the police. ... More >>
Judgment: Transotway Limited v Shephard And Dunphy
Wednesday, 31 August 2005, 1:34 pm | NZ Supreme Court
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT [1] Leave to appeal is granted. Having considered counsel’s written submissions we have not found it necessary to direct an oral hearing. More >>
Judgment: Brown v Attorney-General
Monday, 29 August 2005, 4:51 pm | NZ Supreme Court
BETWEEN EDWIN CHRISTOPHER BROWN Applicant AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. B. Any question of costs is reserved. More >>
